|
|
The Constitution of the United Statesis the Supreme Law of the Land. |
|
All
political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just
powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and
maintain individual rights. |
|
|
HOME | ABOUT US | NEWS | FOR SALE | ARCHIVE |CONTACT | LOGIN |
|
|
Judge Makes Crucial Ruling in Three-and-a-Half Year Old Eviction Case Proving Armed Robbery of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Estate
By: Honest Durden, December 19, 2009
An investigative report featured on the William E. Morris Justice Institutes' website, "Injustice in No Time", gives an objective report that is very revealing; however, this case provides bona fide substantial evidence showing the extent the officials use their position to perform unlawful acts to protect their own and way of doing things. [Maricopa County Evictions Proves Racketeering]
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
Base on the the pure number of officials that have joined the gang's conspiracy, the MCOCG's influence and intimidations are far reaching. To threaten, certain attorneys are black listed; litigants are deprived of property and rights, then blocked from justice and the courts. How is that different than an organize crime gang generally known as the mafia?
As the September 4, 2008, article sets-forth on this website, Judge Fletcher tampered with the record to get rid of Judge Haworth’s valid order and reinstated Anderson’s void order to make it appear valid.
Judge McMurdie’s order based on the "Petition for Special Action", makes it clear that Judge Fletcher had no lawful authority to reinstate the void judgment. [See Special Action Petition]
The void judgment was rendered, August 10, 2005, by former Peoria/Lake Pleasant Justice Court's presiding justice Lex Anderson.
Anderson had proceeded without jurisdiction, i.e., power to adjudicate against the Stones because they had filed bankruptcy. Yet, when Anderson was told about the bankruptcy, he made a slick move by writing the order stating that the eviction was off, but did not mention that had no power to evict the Stones later, but made it appear that he did.
For over three and a half years, the Stones were told that they had no right, they lost, stop or go to jail. Now you're in jail, so stop, the judgment was good, the court had power, go away, get lost, or drop dead, niggers because "you will get nothing".
On June 20, 2008, before the gang knew he would be ruling, Pro Tem Justice of the Peace Richard Haworth, sitting in for Judge Handley, had the case before him and saw in the record that the order that was used to evict the Stones and steal their belongings was no good and destroyed the order.
Since that order that was being touted
from court to court as valid was now legally deemed invalid and
destroyed, there was nothing to justify the eviction. So to prevent
the arrests of Kent Harding and his attorneys Scott M. Clark and
Paul A. Henderson, and many others, the void judgment had to be made to
look valid, so the judges could rule around it and prevent the
arrests and get rid of the Stones, however unlawfully.
There are 21 subsequent orders to the
void order and those subsequent orders were rendered in the federal
court, the bankruptcy court, the state court, and the justice courts
acting in common to intentionally and unlawfully validate the void
order.
Although a major battle has been won, the war is not over. As with any other crime gang they will not stop until they are stopped.
The Stones say that until arrests are
made to start prosecuting the Maricopa County Organized Crime Gang,
there's no telling what they will do next.
|
|
|
C0PYRIGHT © 2009 • Concerned Citizens Coalition
for Enforcement of Equality and Individual Rights |
|